There was an issue that came up yesterday which I want to make my personal opinion on.
Chukwubike O Charles
Dr Leo's presentation of another probable meaning or interpretation of the proverb was an academic exercise and is exactly why we are here especially in a ‘tone” language as ours where one thing could mean twenty.
A critical analysis or thinking of postulations is what the school prepares us for and are also the foundation of development in science and arts.
In medical school we are not just taught how to pull out babies from women or “yank stubborn" ones from the womb. We are thought and encouraged to query those systems and methods and these invariably helped in the development of science. I think I've read one of Dr.Chukwualis' papers on this for example.
We have many wrong or inappropriate ways and thoughts which we perceived or received wrongly from our parents or society that shaped our lives and that these critical analysis have addressed . Look at the time it is still taking us to understand that cold pack is more appropriate when we hit our toes on a rock than the age long *miri ọkụ with essential balm or Aboniki combination* which is wrong!
That most convulsions in babies come from and with high body temperature and that one of the fastest remedies is to lower the body temperature,instead of the *élú akụ* (nshiku system that was passed to us) which we use to massage the baby's body and which works the opposite because it closes the skin pores and insulates it thereby trapping the heat inside the baby due to no passage of oxygen and water from the skin and hair roots already blocked with the oil or other fats we used . These are some of the wrong notions critical thinking and research in science continue to develop.
This is why we are here and this is why we are encouraged to listen to every opinion. This is different from what we call “blind arguments” in the street.
Good morning all
Charlie.mbc@gmail.com
No comments:
Post a Comment